EDCI 338 Blog #7 – Community Engagement & Your PLN

Community Engagement is Public Communications

The power of community engagement - CEO Monthly
Image from CEO Monthly

What are the benefits of a diverse and inclusive PLN in social media sharing that understands where you are coming from with messaging that impacts the community?

As mentioned in previous blog posts, the benefits of PLNs stemming from an understanding of the community and its issues and a drive to improve it, are diverse. Clark and Aufderheide (2011) argue that multiplatform, open, and digital public media are essential to democratic public life, and are supported both for and by the public to educate, inform and mobilize users (p. 56). They refer to this as public media 2.0. In the transition from public media broadcasting to the Internet to social media, the masses have expanded from consumers to the centre of the media and producers as well.

Figure captured from Clark and Aufderheide (2011)

Clarke and Aufherheide (2011) state that people can unite through diverse, multiplatform projects; they come in as participants and leave as members of the public after being affected by an issue and learning how to resolve it. They state that these projects are platforms for people to meet, learn, exchange information, discuss solutions, and possibly take action. Leaders for public media must first understand two needs: content and coordination. From Clark and Aufderheide (2011) – the core functions of a coordinating body (and media 2.0) may include:

  • keeping democracies democratic
  • providing essential accountability in a healthy society
  • forming around issues, problems, and opportunities that lead to improvement
  • providing an accessible and reliable platform for public interaction,
  • providing a toolset for public participation,
  • setting standards and metrics to assess public engagement,
  • developing a recommendation engine to identify and point to high-quality media,
  • committing staff at local and national levels primarily to building public engagement with media and to partnerships to make it happen,
  • tracking emerging technologies and platforms to assess and secure their
    potential for public media 2.0.
  • public media and democratic governance are mutually reinforcing – echoing some ideas in the interview with Markiel Simpson
  • engaging stakeholders around issues on projects that are accessible to and representative of the applicable population
  • offering a location for engagement
Figure captured from Clark and Aufderheide (2011)

References

Clark, J., & Aufderheide, P. (2011). A new vision for public media: Open, Dynamic, and Participatory. In S.C. Jansen, J. Pooley, & L. Taub-Pervizpour (Eds.), Media and Social Justice (pp. 55-67). Palgrave Macmillan New York. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/10.1057/9780230119796

Miller, J., & Simpson, M. (2021). EDCI – 338 Markiel Simpson. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsoDHGaXNNs&ab_channel=MILLER

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *